Uninterrupted Dependency: Mexico’s Passive and Limited Revolution (1910–1920)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2025.6.3.429

Keywords:

Mexican Revolution, Gramsci, passive revolution, dependency, historical materialism

Abstract

In 1938, while analyzing the Mexican Revolution, Trotsky argued that the attainment of national independence required a rupture with relations of dependency, a process he considered to be conditioned by international factors. Although Gramsci did not focus directly on Mexico, he formulated a theoretical question similar to the one perceived by Trotsky. This article examines the Mexican Revolution from that perspective, exploring whether this historical process led to the overcoming of dependency relations and the achievement of national independence, a concept I refer to in this work as "relative geopolitical autonomy."

The proposed analysis is grounded in a theoretical framework derived from Gramsci’s work, whose continuity with Marx’s thought is fundamental. The text begins with the premise that the Porfirio Díaz regime failed to adapt the economic structure, which still retained precapitalist traits, to the complex capitalist superstructures, thereby preventing the formation of a historical bloc. This unfinished process was taken up by the emerging Mexican bourgeoisie but became complicated by the eruption of grassroots social movements, primarily led by landless peasants and, to a lesser extent, the industrial proletariat.

Consequently, it is argued that the Mexican Revolution had a passive and limited character. The notion of passive revolution is particularly applicable to its final phase, when the emerging bourgeoisie co-opted popular demands and neutralized them. At the same time, its scope was limited due to the decisive influence of international factors, especially the intervention of the United States. This passive nature of the revolution, in turn, contributed to the reproduction of dependency relations. The article concludes that the Cárdenas government, highlighted by Trotsky, represented the highest—though never full—degree of independence achieved by Mexico, a level that steadily declined in the subsequent decades.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Lorenzo Fusaro, Metropolitan Autonomous University

    PhD in International Political Economy from King’s College London. Associate Professor C in the Department of Economics at the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Azcapotzalco Campus (UAM-Az). Member of the Sistema Nacional de Investigadoras e Investigadores (SNII) and Head of the Research Area on Society and Capitalist Accumulation (ASAC). Prior to joining UAM, he taught at the University of Cambridge and at King’s College London. His recent publications include Crises and Hegemonic Transitions: From Gramsci’s Quaderni to the Contemporary World Economy (Brill, 2019), Revisiting Gramsci’s Notebooks (Brill, 2020), and The General Law of Capitalist Accumulation in Latin America and Beyond (Lexington Books, 2022). Currently, he is working on a new monograph titled Revolutions, Dependency and Geopolitical Autonomy: The Emergence of Hegemonic and Subordinated States (forthcoming with Routledge).

References

Callinicos, Alex. 2010. “The limits of passive revolution”. Capital and Class, 34 (3): 491-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816810378265

Cardoso, Ciro. 1980. México en el siglo XIX (1821-1910). Historia económica y de la estructura social. México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

Castañeda, Jorge. 1963. “Revolution and foreign policy: Mexico’s experience”. Political Science Quarterly, 78 (3): 391-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2146002

Cockroft, James D. 1968. Intellectual precursors of the Mexican Revolution, 1910-1913. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Córdova, Arnaldo. 1980. La ideología de la revolución mexicana. México: Ediciones Era.

Dos Santos, Theotonio. 1978. Imperialismo y Dependencia. México: Era.

Frosini, Fabio. 2016. ‘L’egemonia e i “subalterni”: utopia, religione, democrazia’. International Gramsci Journal, 2 (1): 126-166.

Frosini, Fabio. 2020. “Time and revolution in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks”. Revisiting Gramsci’s Notebooks, editado por Francesca Antonini, Aarón Bernstein, Lorenzo Fusaro y Robert Jackson. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Fusaro, Lorenzo. 2019. Crises and hegemonic transitions. From Gramsci’s Quaderni to the contemporary world economy. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004384781

Fusaro, Lorenzo. 2022. “Marx´s General Law and the Development of Underdevelopment”. The General Law of Capitalist Accumulation in Latin America and Beyond, editado por Lorenzo Fusaro y Leinad Johan Alcalá Sandoval. Lanham: Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781793638243

Garciadiego, Javier. 2017. “¿Por qué, cuándo, cómo y quiénes hicieron la constitución de 1917?” Historia Mexicana, LXVI (3): 1183-1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/hm.v66i3.3380

Gilly, Adolfo. 1983. “La guerra de clases en la revolución mexicana (Revolución permanente y autoorganización de las masas)”. Interpretaciones de la revolución mexicana, coordinado por Antonio Gilly, Arnaldo Córdova, Armando Bartra, Manuel Aguilar Mora y Enrique Semo. México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

Gilly, Adolfo. 1994. La revolución interrumpida. México: Ediciones Era.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Gramsci, Antonio. 2001. Quaderni del Carcere (edizione critica dell’Istituto Gramsci a cura di Valentino. Gerratana). Torino: Einaudi.

Haber, Stephen, et al. 2008. Mexico since 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton, Nora Louise. 1975. “Mexico: The limits of state autonomy”. Latin American Perspectives, 2 (2): 81-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X7500200207

Hesketh, Chris. 2010. “From passive revolution to silent revolution: Class forces and the production of state, space and scale in modern Mexico”. Capital and Class, 34 (3): 383-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816810378152

Howard, Michael Charles y John Edawrd King. 1992. A history of Marxian economics, Volume II, 1929-1990. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862931

Katz, Friedrich. 1983. La guerra secreta en México. Tomo 1: Europa, Estados Unidos y la revolución mexicana. México: Ediciones Era.

Katz, Friedrich. 1992. “Condiciones de trabajo en las haciendas de México durante el Porfiriato: Modalidades y tendencias”. Historia económica de México, coordinado por Enrique Cárdenas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Katz, Friedrich. 1998. The life and times of Pancho Villa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804765176

Keen, Benjamin, y Keith Haynes. 2009. A history of Latin America. Boston: Wadsworth: Cenguage Learning.

Keller, Renata. 2016. “U.S.-Mexican relations from independence to the present”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.269

Knight, Alan. 1985. “The Mexican Revolution: Bourgeois? Nationalist? Or just a ‘Great Rebellion’?” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 4 (2): 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3338313

Knight, Alan. 1986. The Mexican Revolution (2 vols.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Marx, Karl y Friedrich Engels. 1956-1990. Marx-Engels-Werke (MEW) (43 vols.). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

Modonesi, Massimo. 2017. Revoluciones Pasivas en América. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Montalvo, Enrique. 1985. El nacionalismo contra la nación. México: Grijalbo.

Moreno-Brid, Juan Carlos, y Jaime Ros. 2009. Development and growth in the Mexican economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195371161.001.1

Morton, Adam David. 2010a. “Reflections on uneven development: Mexican Revolution, primitive accumulation, passive revolution”. Latin American Perspectives, 37 (1): 7–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X09350767

Morton, Adam David. 2010b. “The continuum of passive revolution”. Capital y Class, 34 (3): 315-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816810378266

Morton, Adam David. 2013. Revolution y state in modern Mexico: The political economy of uneven development. Lanham, MD: Rowman y Littlefield Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781442229457

Peña de la, Sergio. 2013. La formación del capitalismo en México. México: Siglo XXI.

Ruiz, Ramón Eduardo. (1980). The Great Rebellion: Mexico 1905-1924. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Roccu, Roberto. 2017. “Passive revolution revisited: From the Prison Notebooks to our ‘great and terrible world’”. Capital and Class, 41 (3): 537-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692120

Ruiz, Luis F. 2008. “Where have all the Marxists gone? Marxism and the historiography of the Mexican Revolution”. A Contracorriente, 5 (2): 196-219.

San Juan Victoria, Carlos y Salvador Velázquez Ramírez. 1980. “La formación del Estado y las políticas económicas (1821-1880)”. México en el siglo XIX (1821-1910). Historia económica y de la estructura social, coordinado por Ciro Cardoso, 65-96. México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

Semo, Enrique. 2003. “Revoluciones Pasivas en México”. Antología de Cultura y Sociedad Mexicana, 171-181. Ciudad Juárez: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.

Semo, Enrique. 1983. “Reflexiones sobre la revolución mexicana”. Interpretaciones de la revolución mexicana, coordinado por Adolfo Gilly, Aarnaldo Córdova, Armando Bartra, Manuel Aguilar Mora y Enrique Semo. México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

Shulgovski, Anatoli. 1985. México en la encrucijada de su historia. México: Ediciones de Cultura Popular.

Skirius, John. 2003. “Railroad, oil and other foreign interests in the Mexican Revolution, 1911-1914”. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35 (1): 25-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006648

Soto Reyes Garmendia, Ernesto. 2016. Revolución pasiva y consolidación del moderno Estado mexicano 1920-1940. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Tannenbaum, Frank. 2015. The Mexican agrarian revolution. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.

Thomas, Peter. 2018. “Gramsci’s revolutions: Passive and permanente”. Modern Intellectual History, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000306

Thomas, Peter. 2018a. “Refiguring the subaltern”. Political Theory, 46 (6), 861-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591718762720

Trotsky, Leon. 1938. “The cause of Mexico, like the cause of Spain, like the cause of China, is the cause of the international working class”. In defence of Marxism https://www.marxist.com/mexico-british-imperialism-trotsky.htm.

Trotsky, Leon. 1980. The history of the Russian Revolution. New York: Pathfinder Press.

San Juan Victoria, Carlos y Salvador Velázquez Ramírez. 1980. “El Estado y las políticas económicas en el Porfiriato”. México en el siglo XIX (1821-1910). Historia económica y de la estructura social, coordinado por Ciro Cardoso, México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

Womack, John. 1986. “The Mexican Revolution, 1910-1920”. The Cambridge history of Latin America, Vol. V, editado por Leslie Bethell, 79-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521245173.003

Womack, John. 2011. Zapata and the Mexican Revolution. Nueva York: Random House.

  • Abstract 414
  • PDF (Spanish) 164
  • Visor XML (Spanish) 76
  • ePub (Spanish) 39

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

Perspectives / Research articles

How to Cite

“Uninterrupted Dependency: Mexico’s Passive and Limited Revolution (1910–1920)”. 2025. FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN 6 (3): 8-36. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2025.6.3.429.

Metrics