The calculator and artificial intelligence: resistance to scientific progress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2026.7.2.484Keywords:
Technology in knowledge, electronic calculator, artificial intelligence, scientific processAbstract
This essay reflects on the reception of two technological tools that have undergone both knowledge and the classroom: the electronic calculator and artificial intelligence. For previous generations, the calculator seemed to “think faster than we do”; for ours, artificial intelligence produces a similar effect. It is therefore unsurprising that, within the educational sphere, attempts have been made to keep these tools at the margins of cognitive processes. However, by excluding them, there is a risk of overlooking their potential to expand and reorganize our ways of comprehending the world.
Just as the calculator did not displace mathematics –but rather compelled it to reorient itself towards its abstract foundations rather than its mechanical procedures–, artificial intelligence, as long as it is integrated critically, does not replace human thought: it challenges and optimizes certain of its processes. This text compares the initial reception of the calculator with the current perception of artificial intelligence in the educational domain. The purpose is to reflect on the fears associated with the possible replacement of those who have traditionally served as custodians of knowledge by artificial intelligence, and to contrast these concerns with the opportunity to transform and enhance both the transmission and the generation of knowledge through this technology.
Downloads
References
Bell, Eric Temple. 1937. Men of mathematics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Brown, Harold. 1985. “Galileo on the telescope and the eye.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16, no.4: 305-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709541
Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2026. “Topology: History of topology.” Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Flynn, James R. 1987. “Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure.” Psychological Bulletin 101, no. 2: 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171
Gerlich, Michael. 2025. “AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and critical thinking.” Societies 15, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Ifrah, Georges. 2000. The universal history of computing: From the abacus to the quantum computer. New York: Wiley.
International Labour Organization. 2025. Generative AI and jobs: A refined global index of occupational exposure (Working Paper). International Labour Organization.
Kojali, Kaitilin Jean. 2023. “Resistance, adoption, and adaptation to Gutenberg’s printing press.” Kennesaw Journal of Undergraduate Research 10, no. 1: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.62915/2474-4921.1270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62915/2474-4921.1270
Light, Jennifer S. 1999. “When computers were women.” Technology and Culture 40, no. 3: 455-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.1999.0128
Lynn, Richard & David Becker. 2019. The intelligence of nations. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
OECD. 2023. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
OECD. 2024. Who will be the workers most affected by AI? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Pietschnig, Jacob & Martin Voracek. 2015. “One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013).” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, no. 3: 282-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701
Platón. 2016. Fedón / Fedro (edición bilingüe).Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Psyche. 2022. “The fear that trashy media will rot your brain goes way back.” https://psyche.co/ideas/the-fear-that-trashy-media-will-rot-your-brain-goes-way-back
Stocchi, Manlio Pastore. 2011. “The telescope: Outline of a poetic history.” Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 441: 37-44.
Trithemius, Johannes. 2018. Elogio de los amanuenses. México: UNAM.
UNESCO. 2023. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Downloads
-
Abstract 58
-
PDF (Spanish) 32
-
Visor XML (Spanish) 11
-
ePub (Spanish) 6
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michel Eduardo Betancourt-Gómez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All works published in FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN are subject to an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. Authors are owners of their articles and can republish them in other media, provided that they communicate it to the editors and indicate the texts were originally published in FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN

















