Philosophical Problems of Technological Substantivism: An Ontological and Political Approach Based on Jacques Ellul and Jun Tosaka

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2026.7.2.467

Keywords:

Technological substantivism, Technopessimism, Technology Philosophy, Technodiversity, Technological Universalism

Abstract

Among the philosophical perspectives that analyze technology, technological substantivism has been one of the most important of the 20th century. Misunderstood and in some cases rejected for its “eminently” pessimistic nature, this approach offers an interpretation that combines ontological and political problems within the framework of contemporary technological phenomena. Issues such as the universalization of technology, cultural homogenization, and tensions arising from the search for alternative forms of technological production are among the many topics addressed by this perspective. The main objective of this article is to analyze some of these themes based on the figures of Jacques Ellul (France) and Jun Tosaka (Japan) in order to delve into the conceptual diversity of this approach. The method of analysis will be exegetical, that is, focused on the interpretation of a selected corpus, which will provide philosophical discussions and useful results for approaching technology from this discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Fernando Wirtz, Kyoto University. Departamento de Estudios Transculturales

    He holds a degree in Philosophy from Universidad de Buenos Aires and a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Tübingen, Germany. He currently serves as an assistant professor in the Department of Transcultural Studies at Kyoto University, Japan. He has published the monographs Phänomenologie der Angst (2022) and Myth and Ideology (2023) and co-edited the anthologies Después de la Nada (2023), Miki Kiyoshi and the Crisis of Thought (2024), and Philosophies in Lateinamerika: eine Einführung (2024). He also serves as treasurer of the Gesellschaft für Interkulturelle Philosophie and Chief Editor of the Bulletin of Intercultural Philosophy.

  • Ricardo Andrade, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología, Cultura y Desarrollo. CONICET

    Master's degree in Foreign Language Literature and Comparative Literature from Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA); diploma in Contemporary Philosophical Problems (UBA); and Bachelor's degree in Literature from Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV). He is currently a trainee of theConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and is pursuing his doctorate in Social Sciences and Humanities with a specialization in Social Studies of Science and Technology (UNRN). His current research areas include philosophy of technology (artificial intelligence, human-robot interactions) social robotics, (transhumanism, nanotechnology), among others, philosophy of ecology, astrobioethics, astropolitics, and posthumanism. He has also worked as a researcher in German literature. He has written research articles for national and international journals and has participated in conferences on these fields.

References

Aikawa, Haruki. 1933. "Gijutsu oyobi tekunorogī no gainen技術及びテクノロギーの概念[Sobre el concepto de Technik y tecnología]." Yuibutsuron kenkyū唯物論研究 [Estudios de materialismo], n.º 8: 806-822.

Bucharin, Nikolai Iwanowitsch. 1931. Die sozialistische Rekonstruktion und der Kampf um die Technik: über die technische Propaganda und ihre Organisation. Moskau: Verlagsgenossenschaft Ausländischer Arbeiter in der UdSSR.

Carter, Robert E. 2013. The Kyoto School: An Introduction. New York: State University of New York Press.

Crespín Perales, Montserrat. 2021. “Tosaka Jun y las funciones epistémicas de la cultura: materiales para un estudio sobre transhistoricidad e identidades colectivas”. Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 54, no.1: 55–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/asem.74707

Ellul, Jacques. 1954. La Technique, ou l'Enjeu du siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.

Ellul, Jacques. 1964. The Technological Society. Toronto: Vintage Books.

Ellul, Jacques. 2003. La edad de la técnica. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro.

Feenberg, Andrew. 2006. “What Is Philosophy of Technology?” In Defining Technological Literacy. Towards an Epistemological Framework,edited by John R. Dakers, 5-16. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_2

Hanks, J. Craig y Emily Kay Hanks. 2015. “From Technological Autonomy to Technological Bluff: Jacques Ellul and Our Technological Condition.” Human Affairs 25, no. 4: 460-470. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0037

Heisig, James W. 2001. Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Houkes, Wybo y Pieter E. Vermass. 2010. Technical Functions. On the Use and Design of Artefacts. Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Hui, Yuk. 2023. “Rethinking Technodiversity.” The UNESCO Courier 2: 42-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/22202293-2023-2-12

Hui, Yuk, 2013. “The Technological System and the Problem of Desymbolization”. En Jacques Ellul and the Technological Society in the 21st Century, edited by Helena M. Jerónimo, José Luis Garcia y Carl Mitcham, 73-82 Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6658-7_6

Inutsuka, Yū. 2020. “The historical development of the concept of technology in Japan.” Mechane (March): 235–246. Recuperado de https://mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/mechane/article/view/338.

Kawashima, Ken C., Fabian Schäfer y Robert Stolz. 2013. Tosaka Jun: a Critical Reader. New York: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781942242680

Kimoto, Takeshi. 2009. “Tosaka Jun and the Question of Technology.” En Whither Japanese Philosophy? Reflections through Other Eyes, edited by Nakajima Takahiro, 121–140.Tokyo: UTCP.

Latouche, Serge. 2014. Hecho para tirar: La irracionalidad de la obsolescencia programada. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro.

Lennerfors, Thomas Taro y Kiyoshi Murata, eds. 2019. Tetsugaku companion to Japanese ethics and technology. Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59027-1

Loeve, Sacha, Xavier Guchet y Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent. 2018. “Is There a French Philosophy of Technology? General Introduction.” In French Philosophy of Technology. Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches, edited by Sacha Loeve, Xavier Guchet and Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, 1-20. Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89518-5_1

Marx, Karl. 2010. El capital: Crítica de la economía política. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.

Miki, Kiyoshi. 2021. “The Ideal of Technology, Technology and the New Culture.” European Journal of Japanese Philosophy 6: 323–351.

Mimura, Janis. 2011. Planning for Empire: Reform Bureaucrats and the Japanese Wartime State. New York: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801449260.001.0001

Moore, Aaron. 2013. Constructing East Asia: Technology, Ideology, and Empire in Japan’s Wartime Era, 1931-1945. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804785396.001.0001

Nishikawa, Tomio. 2018. “On Tosaka Jun’s Scientific-Technological Spirit” 戸坂澄の科学的・技術的精神をめぐって In The Philosophy of the Kyoto School, edited by Masakatsu Fujita. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8983-1_8

Parente, Diego. 2010. “La idea de malfunción en los artefactos técnicos”. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad 5, no. 14 (mayo): 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52712/issn.1850-0013-842

Sereni, Cristina Andrea. 2021. “Digital Nomos and the New World Order: Towards a Theological Critique of Sillicon Valley.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 4, no.1: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1843870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1843870

Simondon, Gilbert. 2008. El modo de existencia de los objetos técnicos. Buenos aires: Prometeo Libros.

Son, Wha-Chul. 2013. “Are We Still Pursuing Efficiency? Interpreting Jacques Ellul’s Efficiency Principle.” In Jacques Ellul and the Technological Society in the 21st Century, 49-62, edited by Helena M. Jerónimo, José Luis Garcia and Carl Mitcham. Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6658-7_4

Tosaka, Jun. 1933. Gijutsu no tetsugaku技術の哲学 [Filosofía de la tecnología]. Tokio: Jichōsha.

Tosaka, Jun. 1966. Tosaka Jun zenshū戸坂潤全集[Obras completas de Tosaka Jun] ]. Tokyo: Keisō Shobō勁草書房.

Tosaka, Jun. 1995. “Problemas intelectuales del Japón contemporáneo.” En Textos de la filosofía japonesa moderna: antología, 331-354, editado por Agustín Jacinto Zavala. México: Colegio de Michoacán.

Tosaka, Jun. 2024. The Japanese Ideology: A Marxist Critique of Liberalism and Fascism. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tosa21652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/tosa21652

Vaccari, Andrés. 2022. “Cosmotechnical Thought Between Substantivism and the Empirical Turn.” Foundations of Science 27, no. 4: 1279-1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09754-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09754-1

Vaccari, Andrés. 2020. “No hay asiento eyector para escapar de la historia: Apocalipsis tecnológico como sustantivismo acelerado.” En Tecnología, política y algoritmos en América Latina, 255-275, editado por Andrés Maximiliano Tello. Chile: CENALTES Ediciones.

Wirtz, Fernando. 2025. “Character and Everydayness: The Bottom-Up Historical Epistemology of Tosaka Jun.” The Journal of East Asian Philosophy 5. 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43493-023-00021-8 (Original paper published 28 July 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43493-023-00021-8

  • Abstract 54
  • PDF (Spanish) 19
  • Visor XML (Spanish) 3
  • ePub (Spanish) 9

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Section

The Locus of Technology (Research articles)

How to Cite

“Philosophical Problems of Technological Substantivism: An Ontological and Political Approach Based on Jacques Ellul and Jun Tosaka”. 2026. FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN 7 (2): 78-97. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.26832917e.2026.7.2.467.

Metrics