Two views of the same plague

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.figuras.2020.1.3.119

Keywords:

epidemic, plague, Samuel Pepys, Daniel Defoe, literary diaries, contagion

Abstract

Initially, the text addresses the recurrent epidemic outbreaks throughout human history as a constant problem, not only of health, but also as a terrible issue within social structure. The review locates literature as a fundamental element for the re-creation of epidemic recognizing in this way, the constant actions to mitigate and control them and, also, to distinguish the acts of social groups with various purposes. The second part, the most important, reflects deeply on the diaries of two English writers: Samuel Pepys, enriched in and with the plague, and Daniel Defoe, who had greater concerns in almost all cultural spheres, about the epidemic that struck London.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Armando González-Torres, Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes y Literatura

He studied International Relations at El Colegio de México. He has collaborated on different cultural supplements and magazines such as Viceversa, Letras Libres, Nexos, among others. He won the Premio Nacional de Literatura Gilberto Owen (1995) and the Premio Nacional de Ensayo Alfonso Reyes (2001). He is member of the Sistema Nacional de Creadores and author of numerous essays, aphorisms and poetry books such as Los días prolijos (2001) and La peste (2010).

References

Canetti, Elías. Masa y poder. Madrid: Alianza-Muchnik, 1983.

Defoe, Daniel. Diario del año de la peste. Madrid: Impedimenta, 2010.

Pepys, Samuel. Diarios 1660-1669. Sevilla: Renacimiento, 2014.

—The diary of Samuel Pepys. Darly entries from the 17th century Londo diary. https://www.pepysdiary.com/diary

Solnit, Rebeca. A Paradise Built in Hell. Nueva York: Penguin, 2010.

Watts, Sheldon. Epidemias y poder. Historia, enfermedad, imperialismo. Santiago: Andrés Bello, 2000.

Published

2020-07-01

How to Cite

González-Torres, Armando. 2020. “Two Views of the Same Plague”. FIGURAS REVISTA ACADÉMICA DE INVESTIGACIÓN 1 (3):66-70. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.figuras.2020.1.3.119.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    496
  • PDF (Español)
    447
  • Visor XML (Español)
    178
  • ePub (Español)
    39

Issue

Section

Critiques (Resonances)

PlumX Analytics permite categorizar, visualizar y analizar el impacto social y académico de investigadores e instituciones